ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Estate Planning Blogs -> Toronto Estate Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Estate Planning

: Toronto Estate Law Blog

RULE 38.10 - TRIAL OF AN ISSUE

By Hull & Hull LLP

ADVERTISEMENTS

 

Many estate litigation proceedings start by way of an application. However, from a practical and legal standpoint, contentious applications should be converted to a trial of an issue(s). Where the parties agree that credibility is at the heart of an application, a trial is warranted. Rule 38.10(1) states:

On the hearing of an application, the presiding judge may… order that the whole application or any issue proceed to trial... 

In the normal course, once an application is converted to a trial of an issue, the court orders directions regarding the procedure to be followed by the parties (i.e. an order for directions).

In Gordon Glaves Holdings Ltd. v. Care Corp. of Canada (1998)[1][1], the Ontario Divisional Court considered the test to convert an application to a trial of issues:

The general rule is that the court will not determine genuine issues of credibility on the hearing of an application. Such issues should be decided at trial by the trier of fact [Citations Omitted/Emphasis Added]. In my opinion, the central issues in this case could not properly be determined without a trial, because they depended on questions of credibility. 

Proceeding by way of a trial of a trial of an issue, which requires oral testimony, will allow a judge to “eyeball” witnesses and decided who ultimately to believe. 

Recently, I was involved in a proceeding that alleged a secret trust. It was commenced by way of an application, but after some resistance from opposing counsel, the application was converted to a trial of an issue. In the end, the application could not properly be determined without a court deciding: (a) exactly what the deceased said to the alleged trustee and beneficiary (if anything); (b) what the parties understood the deceased to mean; and (c) what steps the parties did or did not take regarding the alleged secret trust. The court would have to decide “who to believe” and the parties’ credibility was clearly on the line. Pursuant to Rule 38.10, the application was converted to a trial of issues and an order for directions issued.

Thanks for reading. Enjoy the dying days of summer. 

Joi gin (Cantonese for good-bye)
 

Justin


 

Full post as published by Toronto Estate Law Blog on August 15, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 11/05/26 05:54:06)