Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: SCOTUSBLOGNotable petitions
By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group
A recently filed petition, Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, challenges whether corporations have a right to privacy for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act.
An unrelated petition, Kentucky v. King, tests the constitutional boundaries of the requirement that police seek and receive a warrant before entering a residence.
Finally, Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara County asks whether a federal court can confer a private right of action to enforce a federal contract because the statutory requirement sought to be enforced is part of a contract. The contracts at issue in this case are between drug companies and certain public health care facilities.
Title: Kentucky v. King
Docket: 09-1272
Issues: (1) Under what circumstances can lawful police action impermissibly ”create” exigent circumstances that preclude warrantless entry; and (2) whether the “hot pursuit” exception to the warrant requirement applies only if the government can prove that the suspect was aware he was being pursued.
- Opinion below (Supreme Court of Kentucky)
- Petition for certiorari
Title: Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara County
Docket: 09-1273
Issue: Whether, in the absence of a private right of action to enforce a statute, federal courts have the federal common law authority to confer a private right of action simply because the statutory requirement sought to be enforced is embodied in a contract.
- Opinion below (9th Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari
Title: Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc.
Docket: 09-1279
Issue: Whether Exemption 7(C) of the Freedom of Information Act — which exempts from mandatory disclosure records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes when such disclosure could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of “personal privacy” – protects the “privacy” of corporate entities.
- Opinion below (3d Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari
Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on May 12, 2010 (boomark / email).

Patrick Lett's case (and a few other notable sentencing cases) among "Petitions to Watch"
SCOTUS Blog: Notable petitions include commerce clause and taxpayer standing case
H-1B Cap Petitions for Fiscal Year 2010 Not Reached Yet
Law: Random selection for H-1B petitions








