Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Sixth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Sixth Circuit BlogPublished Clarification on Sec. 3582(c)(2)
ADVERTISEMENTS
On June 30, 2009, the panel of Judges Moore, Gilman, and Phillips (E.D. Tenn.) decided United States v. Johnson and Moss, Nos. 08?3925, 08?3926 (6th Cir. June 30, 2009). The published opinion considers the § 3582(c)(2) motions of two defendants who were indicted for crack and powder cocaine offenses, but who were ultimately sentenced based only on the powder. The court makes clear that a sentence must be based on crack cocaine if a defendant is going to be eligible for relief under the retroactive crack amendments. A conviction that involved crack is insufficient. To be eligible for relief, a defendant must be serving a sentence on which the amount of crack cocaine had an impact. Otherwise, a district court is not authorized to reduce the sentence under § 3582(c)(2).Full post as published by Sixth Circuit Blog on July 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Tenth Creates Circuit Split with Ninth over Applicability of Booker at 3582(c)(2) Resentencings
Second Circuit: Abuse of Discretion Standard Applies to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) Motions
USPTO News: Patent Office Issues Appeals Rules Clarification
District Court Declines to Extend Booker to § 3582 Resentencings
Webb: No 3582 crack reduction where no change in original sentencing range
Jones: No Crack Reduction for 1994 12kilos offender









