ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Second Circuit Sentencing Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: Second Circuit Sentencing Blog

Sadism And The Guidelines

ADVERTISEMENTS

United States v. Freeman, Docket No. 08-1886-cr., 2009 WL 2430667 (2d Cir. Aug. 10, 2009)

On appeal, Freeman challenged the district court's application of a four level enhancement for the possession of images containing sadistic or masochistic conduct.  See U.S.S.G. 2G2.2(b)(4) ("If the offense involved material that portrays sadistic or masochistic conduct or other depictions of violence, increase by 4 levels").  Freeman did not prevail.  Indeed, the Second Circuit held that "when a District Court makes an objective determination that (1) an image depicts sexual activity involving a minor and (2) the depicted activity would have caused pain to the minor, the court establishes an adequate basis for the application of the enhancement set forth in section 2G2.2(b)(4)."

More specifically, the Second Circuit relied on its prior decision in United States v. Delmarie, 99 F.3d 80 (2d Cir. 1996), finding that that case set forth two principles.  First, the determination of whether an image is sadistic . . . is an objective one."  As the Second Circuit explained:

the purpose of the act depicted [and] the reaction of the actor are irrelevant to this determination.  A sentencing court need not determine whether the people depicted in the image are deriving sexual pleasure from the infliction of pain; nor need it gauge whetehr the viewer of the picture is likely to derive pleasure from the fact that the image displays painful sexual acts.  There is also no need for the sentencing court to determine either why the defendant possessed the images or whether he derived pleasure from them. . . . In sum, the subjective intent of those depicted in the image and of those who view the image are entirely irrelevant to the application of this enhancement.  All that matters, as the text of the relevant provision of the Guidelines makes clear, is whether the material portrays masochistic conduct or other depictions of violence.  This determination must e made based on an objective analysis of the material in question.

Second, the Second Circuit found that "if a sentencing court finds that (1) an image depicts sexual activity involving a minor and (2) the depicted activity would have caused pain to the minor, that court need not make any additional findings in order to impose a four-level enhancement" under Section 2G2.2(b)(4) of the Guidelines.

Full post as published by Second Circuit Sentencing Blog on October 21, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0027 secs (from cache 11/02/26 19:36:51)