Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Southern District of Florida
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Southern District of FloridaSupreme Court addresses case of the chocolate penis
The U.S. Supreme Court has ordered a federal appeals court to reconsider the claims of a Georgia death row inmate who is challenging his rape and murder conviction based on some unusual chocolate gifts given to the trial judge and bailiff.
Some jurors hearing the case against defendant Marcus Wellons gave the trial judge chocolate shaped as male genitalia and the bailiff chocolate shaped as female breasts.
In a 5-4 ruling (PDF), the U.S. Supreme Court in a per curiam opinion ordered the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider whether Wellons is entitled to discovery and a hearing in light of a high court ruling last year on behalf of an inmate who contended prosecutors withheld evidence of his drug addiction.
?Neither Wellons nor any court has ascertained exactly what went on at this capital trial or what prompted such ?gifts,? ? the Supreme Court wrote in the per curiam opinion. ?Wellons has repeatedly tried, in both state and federal court, to find out what occurred, but he has found himself caught in a procedural morass.?
The court said that defense counsel did not learn until after the trial about unreported ex parte contacts between jurors and the judge, that jurors and a bailiff planned a reunion, and that jurors gave the chocolate gifts to the judge and bailiff either during or immediately after the penalty phase of the trial.
?From beginning to end, judicial proceedings conducted for the purpose of deciding whether a defendant shall be put to death must be conducted with dignity and respect,? the Supreme Court said in the per curiam opinion. ?The disturbing facts of this case raise serious questions concerning the conduct of the trial, and this petition raises a serious question about whether the Court of Appeals carefully reviewed those facts before addressing petitioner?s constitutional claims.?Ah, that's just too good. In other news: Judge Jordan sentences the Crime Stoppers cop to two months.
And American Idol is back:
Full post as published by Southern District of Florida on January 20, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Hershey Co. et al.
allegedly involved in a chocolate price fixing scheme.
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Chocolate Discharge
G.K.I. Foods agrees to $43,000 settlement after disposing production waste water into a sanitary waste water system.
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.

Supreme Court, 5-4, Vacates Conviction, Citing Jurors’ Chocolate Penis Gift
"Court steps into murder case over jury's gifts"
Is That Your Penis in a Jar Or Are You Just Happy to S ... Wait. Why is Your Penis in a Jar
More Evidence of Benefits of Chocolate for Pregnant Women
Lawsuit: Doctor amputated my penis without permission








