Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> California Appellate Report
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: California Appellate ReportValdevia v. Schwarzenegger (9th Cir. - Sept. 28, 2010)
By Shaun Martin
There are some cases in which the original opinion stands for itself, and fully responds to a later dissent from denial of rehearing en banc. The are others that would substantially benefit from someone responding to the subsequent dissent. At least if you want the opinion to survive.
This, in my opinion, is one of the latter situations.
Notwithstanding the relatively small number of judges who join Judge Bea's dissent, I think there's a decent chance that the Supreme Court takes this one up.
Full post as published by California Appellate Report on September 30, 2010 (boomark / email).

Schwarzenegger -- Gay Marriage Ruling Is a 'Milestone'
ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief
EAs Green: Schwarzenegger a Hypocrite
EMA v. Schwarzenegger Back on SCOTUS Radar
Arnold Schwarzenegger: Hasta La Vista, Tax Lien
ECA Prez on Schwarzenegger vs. EMA








