In-House Counsel

?State-of-the-art technology? as another hackneyed term

By Rees Morrison

No one boasts of their plain-vanilla software, their program that gets the job done and thank you ma?am. Everyone in articles brags about chrome-plated, futuristic, leading-edge whizbang that is the talk of the town. Magazines praise you and pick you for awards if you have dared state-of-the-art technology. Vendors splash the term around unstintingly.

Periodically I rant about purple prose, the clichés that riddle GC-speak (See my post of June 11, 2008: best practice, leader innovation, strategic and world class.). In the jargon of general counsel, other terms have been used so much they ring hollow. In this sad lot I also include with ?state-of-the-art? the weary words ?partnering,? ?bet-the-company-litigation? and ?proactive? (See my post of May 1, 2005: the dark side of partnering; Feb. 28, 2006: BTCL; and Sept. 17, 2006: proactive counseling.).

Full post as published by Law Department Management on February 14, 2009 (boomark / email).