Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IPKatCompanies object to use of trade marks in films
By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.
The IPKat read with bemusement a piece in today's Times describing how Mercedez Benz and the makers of a popular unnamed fizzy drink 'meant to unite the world' insisted that their trade marks be removed from scenes in the film Slumdog Millionaire. The film, the latest by British director Danny Boyle (who sounded off about the issue at the film's premier last night), tells the story of a boy from Bombay's slums who reaches the final of the Indian version of Who Wants to be a Millionaire. The companies are alleged to have thought that their brands would be sullied in shown in the setting of the slums. The film makers were forced to spend thousands of pounds blanking out the logos in scenes were the stars were shown drinking fizzy drinks on a rubbish dump and where a Mercedez car, driven by a gangster, was shown in the slum. According to Boyle:?We wanted to use a Mercedes because . . . this guy, this gangster would drive a Mercedes . . . but if you use Mercedes then clearly you have to get permission, and we asked for their permission and they refused it.?
Could Boyle have just gone ahead and used the trade marks, the IPKat wonders? The use might lead to unsavoury associations, bringing with it a risk of tarnishment, but is it trade mark use, and is trade mark use even needed? (We've had lots of cases about this, but the answer still isn't clear, and perhaps the answer is different for Art.5(2) anyway). This underlines the accute need for clear guidance from the ECJ on the issue for once and for all. Life would be rather difficult if trade mark owners can use their marks to stop real products being shown in films, or even just in films which are not to their liking. Actually, the outcome in this situation could have been worse - at least the companies don't seem to have argued that their product shapes are trade marks, the use of which they can control. Merpel notes with a degree of regret that it wasn't the association with a gangster that annoyed Mercedez, but rather the association with a slum.
Full post as published by IPKat on October 31, 2008 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Best Law Movies
Greatest Legal Movies selected by ABA Journal
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Chemical Companies
alleging danger to people living near the plants.
Hedge Funds
alleging companies involved in mortgage fraud.
Laurin Maritime et al
Class Action Launched Against Companies Responsible for Mississippi Oil Spill

New Trade Marks Office practice to World and Land marks
Blawg of the Day -- Australian Trade Marks Law Blog
Examination of Three-dimensional Marks by Wang Ze
Use it, prove it, or lose it the law on trade-marks








