Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep LinksEFF to Judge: Watch for Fairness in Mass Copyright Suits
By corynne
One of the major problems with the mass copyright lawsuits we seen over the last year is that the judges hearing the cases often aren?t aware of the full legal and practical context of the litigation. That?s because they are asked to make important decisions (e.g., whether to allow the plaintiffs to send out subpoenas for the Does? identities) before any of the defendants have had a chance to point out the fundamental flaws in the plaintiff?s case.
Last Friday, Electronic Frontier Foundation and its co-amici Public Citizen, American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of the Nation?s Capital took one more step toward addressing that problem for one of the cases in the District of Columbia, Call of the Wild v. Does 1-1062. This is actually one of the earlier troll cases: it was originally filed in March of last year, with the U.S. Copyright Group acting as counsel for the plaintiff. In June, EFF submitted an amicus brief noting critical due process and speech problems with the lawsuit. In January, the case (and several other mass copyright cases) was transferred to a new judge, Judge Beryl A. Howell. Shortly thereafter, USCG submitted a response to our brief.
We decided to submit a further brief, because we thought Judge Howell might like to know about various recent developments, such as the fact that federal judges in West Virginia and California have recognized that it is improper to join thousands of people in one lawsuit based solely on the fact that they all allegedly used the same software protocol to share one or more copyrighted works. We urged Judge Howell to take a similar approach and also explained that the plaintiff had failed once again to meet its burden of establishing jurisdiction and to meet the leading test for obtaining a Doe?s identifying information. Finally, we corrected the record regarding measures Judge Rosemary Collyer has taken in similar cases in the District of Columbia to dismiss defendants who had clearly been sued in the wrong court.
We're glad that courts around the country are taking steps to help ensure that the litigation process is fair to both plaintiffs and defendants. We hope Judge Howell will do the same.
Full post as published by Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links on February 08, 2011 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Spike Lee and Showtime
Settlement reached in script copyright infringement lawsuit.
Joke Book
Judy Brown and publishers pay undisclosed settlement to comedians and talkshow celebrities for copyright infringement.
Canceled Insurance
Judge orders Health Net Inc. to pay $9 million settlement after terminating a policyholder's policy after being diagnosed with breast cancer.
Labor and Delivery
Judge awards mother $6 million medical malpractice settlement after baby was born with brain injuries.

Judge Requests Consolidation of Birth Control Suits
Judge Drops Thousands of Anonymous Alleged Porn Downloaders From Suits
Third-party purchases of copyright suits
Righthaven suit dismissed as judge rules blogger's quotes were 'fair use'








