Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep LinksRecommendations for Federal Web Privacy Policy
By tim
Today, EFF and the Center for Democracy and Technology submitted comments to the Office of Management and Budget in response to the agency's review of the policies governing the federal government's use of cookies and other web technologies.
The comments are an extension of recommendations we made in May, in which we suggested that the OMB permit cookie-based web analytics so long as the process was carefully overseen and met with specific strict safeguards. Today, we've expanded our recommendations to include the use of cookies for creating individualized web account logins and other common web practices that we understand government webmasters would like to be able to use. Overall, we continue to urge the government to limit the use of any data collected, to eliminate this data as soon as possible, and to seek third-party oversight.
To see the extent to which the current cookie policy creates confusion and allows invasions of citizens' privacy, one need look no further than the ongoing episode surrounding WhiteHouse.gov's use of embedded YouTube videos. In the current WhiteHouse.gov privacy policy, a waiver grants YouTube the right to use persistent cookies, but only "to help maintain the integrity of video statistics." In contrast, YouTube's privacy policy allows for much broader use, claiming license to permanently store data gleaned from WhiteHouse.gov for use in "marketing campaigns." (In June, Google privately told EFF that it had halted this practice and was ignoring cookies from visitors to WhiteHouse.gov — but, since then, we've been waiting for a clear, public statement from Google to confirm or clarify this.)
Today, we've proposed a new and better framework. We thank the OMB for the opportunity to suggest a solution to these problems and hope our comments will be taken into account.
You can read more about this issue in this morning's Washington Post.
Full post as published by Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links on August 11, 2009 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Landlord Entry Right and Tenant Privacy
When can a landlord enter a rented dwelling
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
State Farm Class Actions
Policy Holders Settle
Wal-Mart
Faces Class Action over Return Policy
AOL Privacy Class Action
Can Proceed
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

Toward A 21st Century Framework for Federal Government Privacy Policy
AT&T Unveils New Privacy Policy. No, Really
Federal privacy commissioner releases annual report on the Privacy Act
Facebook Privacy Change Sparks Federal Complaint








