ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Threat Level

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Threat Level

Senate Keeps Telecom Spying Immunity

By Ryan Singel, Kevin Poulsen, Sarah Lai Stirland, Kim Zetter, and David Kravets

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Senate moved closer Tuesday morning to approving retroactive immunity for telecoms that helped the Bush administration spy on Americans, denying by a vote of 31-67 an amendment that would have stripped amnesty from a bill expanding the government's spy powers.

The amendment to the Senate Intelligence Committee-sponsored spying bill was sponsored by Christopher Dodd (D-Connecticut) who has been vociferous in his opposition to the immunity. Last night, Dodd, a former '08 presidential candidate, describing immunity as "contempt for law." He has threatened to filibuster any bill that contains such a provision.

In addition to providing a get-out-of-court-free card for companies such as AT&T and Verizon, the bill also largely legalizes Bush's secret wiretapping program, by letting the NSA spy inside American telecom and internet infrastructure without getting court approval or having particular targets in mind.

The Senate is voting Tuesday on a series of amendments to the bill. The full bill is set for a vote later Tuesday. Other amendments in play include a scheme to move all the lawsuits to a secret spying court and a proposal from Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse and Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania) to substitute the government for the telecoms in the 40 or so civil cases pending against them.

UPDATE 12:10 p.m. EST: Both of these amendments failed to get a majority of votes. /UPDATE

Proponents of immunity contend the lawsuits will expose how the nation's spies collect information and say the telecoms responded in good faith to requests for help from the administration.

Opponents say the telecoms massively violated federal privacy law intended to protect Americans from overzealous spies and clearly knew the requests violated the law.

Any bill passed by the Senate must be reconciled with a House version. In the fall, the House passed the RESTORE Act, which did not include immunity and limited more sharply when the government could spy inside the United States without getting a court order.

That reconciliation process will by complicated by Monday's death of Rep. Tom Lantos (D-California), since the House will be closed for business on Thursday and Friday so lawmakers can attend Lantos's funeral.

All votes for the bill came from Democrats (and Vermont Independent Bernie Sanders), all Republicans voted against the bill and 15 Democrats voted to keep immunity. As for the presidential contenders, Senator Hilary Clinton (D-New York) did not vote, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Illinois) voted against immunity, and Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona) voted for it.


Full post as published by Threat Level on February 12, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0025 secs (from cache 11/06/26 14:13:48)