Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> TinytechIP
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: TinytechIPUS Patent 7680243 - X-Ray measurement of nanoparticles
This patent from Jordan Valley Semiconductors teaches a new X-ray spectroscopy method for analysing nanostructures. Claim 1 reads:
1. A method for analyzing a sample, comprising: directing one or more beams of X-rays from at least one radiation source to impinge on an area of a surface of the sample on which a layer of nano-particles of a selected element has been formed, including a beam that is incident on the surface at a grazing angle; detecting, using at least one detector, an intensity of X-ray fluorescence emitted from the area in a spectral line that is characteristic of the selected element responsively to the one or more beams; detecting, using the at least one detector, an angular spectrum of the X-rays that are scattered from the area responsively to the beam that is incident on the surface at the grazing angle; and characterizing a distribution of the nano-particles on the surface based on the intensity of the X-ray fluorescence and the angular spectrum of the scattered X-rays.
Full post as published by TinytechIP on March 22, 2010 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment
Qualcomm Settles Patent Suit for $891 Million
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.

When a figure is bad in a patent application.
CIGS: the next big thing in solar
Jury Wrong on Anticipation; But Claims are Obvious as a Matter of Law
Claims Construction Order in Wide, Short Ski Case against K2
Patent Legal Malpractice Cases and Federal Question Jurisdiction









