ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Misleading Advertising Law

Bad Canadians - Global Marketing Group

ADVERTISEMENTS

Image via Wikipedia

From the FTC Press Release on bad Canadians engaged in telemarketing fraud.

"A U.S. district court has granted a summary judgment against Ira N. Rubin and default judgments against 22 corporations that Rubin owned or controlled.

The final court orders permanently bar Rubin and the corporate defendants from engaging in telemarketing and payment processing activities and impose an $8.6 million judgment against them. Rubin ran Global Marketing Group, an international payment-processing operation that illegally debited millions of dollars from U.S. consumers' bank accounts on behalf of numerous telemarketing scams.

Rubin's partner and co-defendant, Kevin Astl, also has reached a settlement with the Commission.

The court order settling the charges against Astl prohibits him from engaging in payment processing, bars him from violating the Federal Trade Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), prevents him from disclosing customer information, and imposes a suspended judgment of $5,145,127 against him.

According to the FTC's amended complaint against the Global Marketing Group defendants, since at least January 2003, the defendants provided substantial support and assistance to at least nine Canadian telemarketing firms that sell non-existent credit cards to U.S. consumers.

In return for an advance fee of several hundred dollars, which the defendants debited from consumers' bank accounts on behalf of the telemarketers, consumers expected to receive an unsecured credit card but instead received either nothing or a worthless "benefits package."

Wouldn't it just be easier to buy a telephone answering device and screen your calls to avoid the advance fee pitch?

Related articles by ZemantaOperation Tele-PHONEY (bizop.ca)Judge shuts down online check service and fraud magnet Qchex (arstechnica.com)Buyer Beware: Top 15 Scams, Annoyances (abcnews.go.com)3 U.S. firms fined $1.2M US for calling do-not-call numbers (cbc.ca)The Ballad of Bernie Madoff (dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com)Avoiding ID theft (cbc.ca)Banks File Class Action Against Heartland (pindebit.blogspot.com)

Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on March 02, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/03/26 22:52:49)