ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Misleading Advertising Law

Can Pigeon King Investors Recover some of their Money?

ADVERTISEMENTS
View of skyscrapers in the financial district ...

Image via Wikipedia

Better Farming, who has done a terrific job writing about the Pigeon King ponzi scheme stumbled at bit in writing about some methods investors can recover their money.
"Jim Patterson, who leads the Toronto-based law firm Bennett Jones LLP's fraud law practice group, told Better Farming earlier this week that he is not currently informed enough about the PKI situation to comment specifically, but will look into it.

Speaking in general terms about Ponzis, Patterson, who has dealt with 20 to 30 Ponzis over 15 years, describes the U.S. approach as "the way to go" for victims looking to recover money lost. The approach involves a court-appointed receiver recovering the gains made by all participants in the scheme and then administering the monies among all of the victims.

A receiver can tackle fund recovery for a scheme that was operated by either an individual or a business, Patterson says. Two or more people who have lost money consult a lawyer and determine whether they could apply to a court to have a receiver appointed."

Patterson should have been informed that there already was a trustee in bankruptcy in place - that would have changed his recommendations.

In a Court appointed receivership, the question of whether the pigeon contracts are debts owed by PKI or evidence of investment contracts is not that important.

However, in a bankruptcy it is critical. If the trustee decides that the pigeon contracts with breeders are really investment contracts in PKI, that is the breeders are stockholders of PKI, then they have no votes at the creditor meetings.

More importantly, as a group the would not be able to go after those breeders who got paid -and there appears to be a lot of them- from Galbraith's scheme.

The trustee appears to have tipped their hand - the breeder contracts are not going to be honoured as Pigeon King debt.

Be on your toes here.

Zemanta Pixie

Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on July 11, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/05/26 09:46:55)