Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Karel's Legal Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Karel's Legal BlogTRANSFERS FOR NO CONSIDERATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN
By Karel.Frielink
The law protects creditors
In general the law in the Netherlands Antilles does not prohibit transfers for no consideration. It should however be pointed out that under Netherlands Antilles law, statutory provisions exist which ensure that transactions whose only reason is to disadvantage creditors or make it impossible for them to seek recourse, may not be performed out. For example, Section 3:45, paragraph 1, of the Civil Code states that if, in the performance of a legal act to which he is not obligated, an obligor, knew or ought to have known that this would adversely affect the possibility of recourse of one or more of his creditors, then the legal act may be annulled; any creditor whose possibility of recourse has been adversely affected by such a legal act may invoke this ground for annulment, irrespective of whether his claim arose before or after the act.
Section 3:46 of the Civil Act states several (aside: refutable) presumptions of law in which one is considered to have known or ought to have known that such prejudice would be the result of the legal act.
Furthermore, as in many other jurisdictions, transactions intended to escape past or present obligations could possibly constitute one or more tortious acts. Supreme Court case law shows, for instance, that transferring money or assets from one (group) company to another, leaving the creditors of the first company unpaid, is a tortious act. The Supreme Court ruled that the lawfulness and acceptability of a so-called split-up of the company into viable and non-viable units depends on whether the group?s most important creditors have been consulted and have consented. If the split-up took place without consultation and consent, it constitutes a tort (NJ 2002, 94).
Karel Frielink
Attorney (Lawyer) / Partner
.
Full post as published by Karel's Legal Blog on January 30, 2009 (boomark / email).
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Grubb & Ellis
alleging violations of fiduciary duties to shareholders and securities laws.
Hewlett-Packard and Staples
allegedly violated antitrust laws in collaborating on the sale of replacement ink jet printer cartridges.
Damaged Billboards
Lamar Advertising pays $35,000 settlement after violating permit laws.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Home Buyers Consulting Network, Inc.
$613, 000 settlement reached in federal laws violation dispute.

U.N. Envoy urges Caribbean nations to decriminalize homosexual behavior
French Tax Authorities Recognize Dutch Same-Sex Marriage
Taking hating your mother's guts to a whole new level!
Milot: The Case Against Tax Incentives for Organ Transfers
Dutch court to hear challenge against film criticizing Islam
Dutch Supreme Court Refers Questions on Article 5(3) Brussels I Regulation








