ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Karel's Legal Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Karel's Legal Blog

TRANSFERS FOR NO CONSIDERATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN

By Karel.Frielink

ADVERTISEMENTS

The law protects creditors

In general the law in the Netherlands Antilles does not prohibit transfers for no consideration. It should however be pointed out that under Netherlands Antilles law, statutory provisions exist which ensure that transactions whose only reason is to disadvantage creditors or make it impossible for them to seek recourse, may not be performed out. For example, Section 3:45, paragraph 1, of the Civil Code states that if, in the performance of a legal act to which he is not obligated, an obligor, knew or ought to have known that this would adversely affect the possibility of recourse of one or more of his creditors, then the legal act may be annulled; any creditor whose possibility of recourse has been adversely affected by such a legal act may invoke this ground for annulment, irrespective of whether his claim arose before or after the act.

Section 3:46 of the Civil Act states several (aside: refutable) presumptions of law in which one is considered to have known or ought to have known that such prejudice would be the result of the legal act.

Furthermore, as in many other jurisdictions, transactions intended to escape past or present obligations could possibly constitute one or more tortious acts. Supreme Court case law shows, for instance, that transferring money or assets from one (group) company to another, leaving the creditors of the first company unpaid, is a tortious act. The Supreme Court ruled that the lawfulness and acceptability of a so-called split-up of the company into viable and non-viable units depends on whether the group?s most important creditors have been consulted and have consented. If the split-up took place without consultation and consent, it constitutes a tort (NJ 2002, 94).

Karel Frielink
Attorney (Lawyer) / Partner

.

Full post as published by Karel's Legal Blog on January 30, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/01/26 21:48:49)