ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Trade Regulation Talk

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Trade Regulation Talk

By John W. Arden

ADVERTISEMENTS

FTC Challenges Refusal to Meet Commitment to License Patents for ?Ethernet?

This posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.

A divided Federal Trade Commission issued a complaint alleging that Negotiated Data Solutions LLC (N-Data) engaged in unfair methods of competition and unfair acts or practices in violation of Sec. 5 of the FTC Act by enforcing certain patents against makers of equipment employing Ethernet?a computer networking standard used in nearly every computer sold in the United States.

A proposed consent order would prohibit the company from charging higher royalties for the technologies used in the standard.

Liability Under Section 5 of FTC Act

In an unusual move, the three commissioners who made up the majority?Commissioners Pamela Jones Harbour, Jon Leibowitz, and J. Thomas Rosch?found N-Data liable for its conduct under Sec. 5 of the FTC Act alone, without a concurrent determination that the conduct rose to the level of a Sherman Act violation.

Recognizing that ?some may criticize the Commission for broadly (but appropriately) applying our unfairness authority to stop the conduct alleged in this Complaint,? the majority contended that the FTC?s authority to stop anticompetitive conduct that does not rise to the level of a Sherman Act violation is unique among federal agencies.

?Using our statutory authority to its fullest extent is not only consistent with the Commission's obligations, but also essential to preserving a free and dynamic marketplace,? the majority noted.

Dissenting Statements

Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras and Commissioner William E. Kovacic dissented and issued separate statements. Chairman Majoras suggested that the case departed materially from the prior FTC standard-setting ?hold up? challenges and that she was not convinced that any party was injured by the challenged conduct. Commissioner Kovacic questioned the impact of the settlement on state unfairness statutes that are modeled after the FTC Act.

N-Data licenses patents that it acquires from inventors or other holders of patents. The patents involved in this matter were originally held by National Semiconductor Corporation.

Commitment to License Technology

According to the FTC's complaint, in 1994, National made a commitment to the IEEE?an electronics industry standard setting organization?that if the IEEE adopted a standard based on National?s patented NWay technology, National would offer to license the technology, for a one-time, paid-up royalty of $1,000 per licensee, to manufacturers and sellers of products that use the IEEE standard.

As alleged in the complaint, N-Data obtained the patents knowing about National?s prior commitment and after the industry became committed to the standard, but N-Data refused to comply with that commitment and instead demanded royalties far in excess of that commitment.

The action is In the Matter of Negotiated Data Solutions LLC, CCH Trade Regulation Reporter ¶16,097.

Full post as published by Trade Regulation Talk on January 28, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/05/26 01:56:13)