Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawUse of hearsay evidence in administrative hearings
Hoffman v Village of Sidney, 252 A.D.2d 844
Edward F. Hoffman, Jr., a Village of Sidney police officer, was served with disciplinary charges pursuant to Section 75 of the Civil Service Law alleging:
1. While off-duty he threatened one or more persons;
2. Insubordination and being disrespectful to a superior; and
3. Violation of department rules and regulations.
Found guilty of the charges, Hoffman was terminated from his position with the village. Hoffman appealed, claiming that the finding that he had made threats was not supported by the record and the penalty imposed was excessive. Another claim that he was improperly suspended without pay for more than 30 days was deemed untimely.
As to Hoffman?s denial that he had made any threatening statements, the court noted that ?the Special Deputy to whom [Hoffman] had made the threatening and disparaging remarks testified at the hearing.?
In addition, witnesses had testified concerning statements made to them by the Special Deputy concerning Hoffman?s threatening statements.
While these constituted ?hearsay? testimony, the Appellate Division pointed out that ?... hearsay is admissible in administrative hearings and may be used to support a finding of substantial evidence.? While Hoffman testified that he made no threatening statements and other witnesses testified that he did, the Court said that ?this simply presented a credibility issue to be determined by the Hearing Officer.?
As to Hoffman?s challenging the penalty imposed, dismissal, the Appellate Division decided that termination was ?not so disproportionate to the underlying offenses as to be shocking to one?s sense of fairness,? citing Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222, ?given the serious nature of the charges and [Hoffman?s] past disciplinary record.?
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on September 09, 2009 (boomark / email).

Internet Evidence (Part II: Hearsay)
Can You Include Hearsay in Affidavits Filed at Temporary Hearings
Federal judge limits use of hearsay evidence in Guantanamo cases
Law School: Hearsay, confrontation, and...oh who am I kidding
Internet Evidence (Part III: Hearsay Exceptions)
Trachtenberg on the history of hearsay









