Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel Law
___________________________________________
EEO/iNews provides weekly links to Internet news related to employment discrimination based on race, sex, color, religion, national origin, age, disability, retaliation, FRD and LGBT. Some links may have expired or require sign-up or subscription.
U.S. Supreme Court
Public Citizen?s most recent Sup Ct Watch list here
SCOTUSblog?s most recent Petitions to Watch here
Ross Runkel?s US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases ? Pending & decided here
Decided
Crawford v. Metro Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 06-1595
Title VII/retaliation: (From SCOTUSwiki): The Court unanimously concluded that the ordinary meaning of ?oppose? includes giving a ?disapproving account? of unlawful behavior, even if the employee takes no further action on her own to seek to stop or remedy the conduct. Accepting the rule set forth in the EEOC?s Compliance Manual, the Court concluded that ?When an employee communicates to her employer a belief that the employer has engaged in . . . a form of employment discrimination, that communication virtually always constitutes the employee?s opposition to the activity.? The Court held open the possibility of ?eccentric cases? in which the employee makes clear his approval of the conduct in conveying the information (for example, describing a racist joke as hilarious probably wouldn?t count as opposing the joke-telling).
January 26, 2009 decision here
SCOTUS docket here
SCOTUSwiki here
14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, No. 07-581
ADEA/Enforceability of collectively bargained arbitration clause
(From SCOTUSwiki): Justice Thomas?s majority opinion held that nothing in either the National Labor Relations Act, which controls collective bargaining agreements made on behalf of union members, or the ADEA forbids unions from mandating arbitration to resolve statutory discrimination claims. The majority touted the importance of allowing parties to bargain contractually for exchanges of rights and responsibilities, and it noted that courts should generally not interfere in this process. According to the majority, ?[t]he decision to fashion a [collective bargaining agreement] to require arbitration of employment-discrimination claims is no different from the many other decisions made by parties in designing grievance machinery.?
April 1, 2009 decision here
SCOTUS docket here
SCOTUSwiki here
AT&T v. Hulteen, No. 07-543
Title VII/Denial of pre-?79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pension
(From the decision syllabus): An employer does not necessarily violate the PDA when it pays pension benefits calculated in part under an accrual rule, applied only pre-PDA, that gave less retirement credit for pregnancy than for medical leave generally. Because AT&T?s pension payments accord with a bona fide seniority system?s terms, they are insulated from challenge under Title VII §703(h).
May 18, 2009 decision here
SCOTUS docket here
SCOTUSwiki here
Noted here: Star Tribune; Class Action Defense blog; FindLaw; RH Reality Check
Argued - Awaiting Decision
Gross v. FBL Fin. Servs, No. 08-441
ADEA/Must a plaintiff present direct evidence of discrimination in order to obtain a mixed-motive instruction in a non-Title VII discrimination case?
March 31, 2009 Argument Transcript here
SCOTUS docket here
SCOTUSwiki here
Ricci v. Destefano, No. 07-1428 and 08-328
Title VII/Whether municipalities may decline to certify results of an exam that would make disproportionately more white applicants eligible for promotion than minority applicants, due to fears that certifying the results would lead to charges of racial discrimination
April 22, 2009 Argument Transcript here
SCOTUS docket here
SCOTUSwiki here
Cornell Law School/LII here
Noted here: Connecticut Employment Law Blog
Selected Cases Pending Cert:
Oakley v. City of Memphis, No. 08-744
T VII
See issue description at Public Citizen:
SCOTUS docket here
McKnight v. Gen. Motors Corp., No. 08-1113
ADA
See issue description at Public Citizen
SCOTUS docket here
Adam v. Salazar, No. 08-1097
ADEA
See issue description at Public Citizen
SCOTUS docket here
Lewis, et al. v. City of Chicago, No. 08-974
TVII
See issue description (+briefs links) at SCOTUSblog
SCOTUS docket here
Noted here: SCOTUSblog (w/ brief links and noting that the Court has invited the views of the SG)
Federal Appellate Court Decisions
Paul Mollica?s Daily Developments in EEO Law here
2nd Circuit
Sassaman v. Gamache, No. 07-2721 (2d Cir. May 22, 2009)
Guy accused of sex harass flips dismissal of his gender discrim suit; key evidence: (1) his supervisor?s statement indicating that men have a propensity to commit sexual harassment and (2) defendants? arguable failure to investigate properly the charges of sexual harassment lodged against him
State Roundup
NY
DECIDED
[5-22] Gender: Jury turns thumbs down to fem cop?s promotion suit vs Niskayuna
New York Court Recognizes Faragher-Ellerth Defense Under State and City Human Rights Laws (in part)
FILED
Age: Non-rehired 73yo mixologist with 27 years experience files EEOC charge of age discrim vs NY Yankees
NEWS
Race: Black Greece Central School District teacher?s NYSDHR claim sparks rally
Sex Harass: Baldwin Principal reassigned after $5M harassment verdict
Ulster Cnty Jail slapped 5 times by EEOC in ?08 w/findings of sex harass/discrim/retal
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on May 29, 2009 (boomark / email).










