ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: PrawfsGood Article!
By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel
ADVERTISEMENTS
Via Arts & Letters Daily, here is a fine article on the revival (and overuse?!) of the exclamation mark. The author suggests that the rise of ! is a creature of the Internet age. He quotes a recent book on the etiquette of email, which notes as a possible explanation that "Email is without affect . . . It has a dulling quality that almost necessitates kicking everything up a notch just to bring it to where it would normally be."
That seems about right to me! Email, and other forms of online writing, lack any accompanying visual or aural cues to help one interpret a person's tone; all bloggers know, through painful experience, that it is often difficult to convey things like sarcasm effectively in this medium. At the same time, the usual short length of non-Horwitzian blog posts (let alone emails) deprives one of the opportunity to use greater length as a substitute for the lack of these cues. Hence, the rise of the exclamation mark.
I'd add one other explanandum. Email conversations have a way of dragging on. You think: "I wrote Person X to ask what time the meeting is. They wrote back and said '3 o'clock.' Should I write back and say thanks? Will they write back and say 'You're welcome?' Can I just close the door on this conversation, or would the failure to respond be too peremptory? Better safe than sorry." An exclamation mark can sometimes nip these things in the bud by putting an enthusiastically polite spin on your correspondence the first time around.
In any event -- read the article! And note that the Pos sometimes uses exclamation marks very effectively!
Full post as published by Prawfs on May 05, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.








