ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Discriminations

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Discriminations

More On The Assumptions Of Obama-like (or -liking) Americans

ADVERTISEMENTS

Yesterday I quoted Matt Bai, writing in the New York Times, arguing that anyone who ?question[s] the responsibilities of government and private entities when it comes to race? is an ?ideological outlier? but that, even so, ?Americans the president?s age and younger are inclined to assume that one can question? those race policies ?without necessarily being dismissed as a racist.?

I of course questioned Bai?s argument about the assumption of those youngish Americans. Today I?d like to point to one of them: Matt Bai, meet Irene Monroe, whose picture on HuffPo reveals both that she?s not only an American the president?s age or younger but that she also, as liberals would say when they?re setting about their regulation of racial markets, looks like him.

She writes today:

As we all know, affirmative action is a hot-button issue. At a basic level, it?s an attempt to take race, gender and ethnicity (to name only a few factors) into consideration to promote a level playing field for all. But the sub-text in all affirmative action debates is the fallacious belief that blacks selected to benefit from it are hopelessly and helplessly genetically inferior ? that their DNA is chromosomally deficient, if not defective.
Leave aside the contradictory argument that affirmative action burdens some and benefits others based on race, ethnicity, and gender in order ?to promote a level playing field for all,? which is rather like saying that blacks and Hispanics have to run only 87 yards in the 100 yard dash while whites must run 100 and Asians 110 ?in order to make the race equal for all.?

What really interests me is not that ubiquitous absurdity but the offensive, and incorrect, accusation that ?the sub-text in all affirmative action debates? is the belief of critics that blacks ?are hopelessly and helplessly genetically inferior ? that their DNA is chromosomally deficient, if not defective.?

I?ve written quite a lot of text here since 2002 criticizing affirmative action. Some readers have read quite a lot of it. I doubt that Ms. Monroe has read any of it, but nevertheless she?s sure that the ?sub-text? of all of it is my belief that blacks are inferior. Either she is not American or she is not younger than President Obama or Matt Bai is in a bubble and doesn?t know what he?s talking about.

Full post as published by Discriminations on May 27, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/03/26 03:10:27)