Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: PrawfsEvidence for non-litigators?
By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel
While I?m blogging about the curriculum, let me ask a question. In addition to teaching first-year courses, I also teach Evidence. At Marquette, as I?m sure is the case at many schools, it?s a required course. That, of course, means that many of the students have no intention of ever setting foot in a courtroom. My colleagues and I have kicked around the idea of tailoring one section to those students. That section might, for example, devote more time to privileges and less time to things like the Confrontation Clause, and would otherwise serve to highlight some of the key evidence-related issues that non-litigators need to be mindful of. Has anyone else done such a thing? What are your thoughts, law-professorial hive-mind, about what would be appropriate to include?
Full post as published by Prawfs on March 18, 2011 (boomark / email).

Young litigators of Toronto, unite!
"Know the Rules for Tech-Based Evidence"
A Smart Resource for Smart Litigators
Know Your Audience: Effectively Presenting Evidence to Generations X and Y
So how many actual Hawai`i litigators are there








