ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> TalkLeft

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: TalkLeft

Obama and Appointing Liberal Judges

By Jeralyn

ADVERTISEMENTS

Jeffrey Toobin has a long article on President Obama and judicial appointments in the new issue of the New Yorker. The object: to ascertain whether Obama is appointing liberal judges. The answer is don't count on it.

First, the numbers:

Just eight months into his first term, Obama already has the chance to nominate judges for twenty-one seats on the federal appellate bench —more than ten per cent of the hundred and seventy-nine judges on those courts.”

Toobin writes Obama played it safe and "post-partisan" in his first choices: [More...]

Obama’s nominees up to this point have been “conventional, qualified, and undramatic choices, who were named, at least in part, because they were seen as likely to be quickly confirmed.....

One White House official tells him, “Our strategy was to show that our judges could get Republican support.”

As to Sotomayor, Toobin points out Obama expected her to have bi-partisan appeal:

However, the positioning of Sonia Sotomayor, Obama’s recently confirmed appointee to the Supreme Court, as a judge who appreciates the importance of judicial restraint—historically, a cornerstone of the conservative idea of jurisprudence—not only indicates a desire for Republican support, but also reflects “an acknowledgement that conservative rhetoric, if not conservative views, had become the default mode for Supreme Court nominees.”

And, Toobin says, Obama is more focused on Congress than the judiciary as an agent of change:

Perhaps most important, though, Obama’s choice of nominees reveals his emphasis on using the legislative branch, rather than the judicial, to insure rights. In his own career, “Obama chose politics over law” as a vehicle for social change....In “The Audacity of Hope,” he wrote, “I wondered if, in our reliance on the courts to vindicate not only our rights but also our values, progressives had lost too much faith in democracy .

His conclusion:

"An Obama Court would almost certainly defer more to congressional and other legislative judgments....Liberals who once saw judges as the lone protectors of constitutional rights are now placing their hopes on elected politicians like Obama.”


Full post as published by TalkLeft on September 14, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/07/26 06:15:39)