ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: The Volokh Conspiracy

Because We Thought The Errors In Your Article Were Cass Sunstein?s Fault

By Orin Kerr

ADVERTISEMENTS
(Orin Kerr)

It is common in the author footnote of law review articles ? you know, the footnote that follows the author?s name that tells you who the author is ? to thank people who have read drafts of the articles and offered comments to help improve it. It is also common to follow that expression of gratitude with a remark that the errors in the article are responsibility of the author rather than the people who helped with it. Here are a few examples of the latter from recent articles, found by running a search for ?thank! /p error! /s mine & da(2009)? in Westlaw?s popular journals and law reviews database:

All errors are mine and mine alone.
Any errors contained herein are mine.
All errors are mine.
All errors, of course, remain mine.
All errors contained herein are mine and mine alone.
All errors and conclusions are mine.
As always, any errors or oversights are mine alone.
Any errors that remain in the paper are mine.

The sentiment is a generous one. You wouldn?t want anyone who just read the paper and offered some comments ? or perhaps who helped do some research for it, such as a research assistant ? to be blamed for errors in the paper. 

At the same time, am I right that such sentiments are pretty useless? If a paper has an error in it, I put the responsibility for that on the author. If it?s a Bluebooking error, I might put the responsibility on the editors of the journal who were in charge of Bluebooking. But it would never occur to me to blame a person who read an article and offered comments for any errors found in the paper. Comments are just comments. They?re food for thought that the author can accept or reject, not a mandate to adopt the argument that the commenter suggests. The author is the person with her name on the front page: No one needs to be reminded that the author is ultimately responsible for the contents of what follows. 

Assuming others see it the same way, can we all agree to retire the ?all errors are my own? line? I realize that it isn?t the most pressing problem facing America right now. But it would be very easy to fix, and I don?t think anyone would miss it.


Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on September 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/06/26 17:01:50)