Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> ACLU Newsroom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: ACLU NewsroomNYCLU: Policy Relaxing Scientific Standards for Use of DNA in Crime Investigations Will Lead to Law-Enforcement Abuses and Civil Rights Violations
By ACLU
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: media@aclu.org
NEW YORK – In a split vote, 7-4, New York State's Commission on Forensic Sciences approved a policy authorizing law-enforcement to investigate the family members of an individual whose DNA does not precisely match crime scene evidence.
The scientific rationale is that a "partial match" between a sample of DNA from a crime scene and the DNA of someone in the state's DNA databank may implicate a blood relative of that individual.
The New York Civil Liberties Union strongly opposes the policy, charging that the new procedure all but invites an abuse of privacy and due process rights by relaxing technical standards for the use of DNA without adequate protection against error and abuse by law enforcement.
"The Commission has opened a Pandora's Box," said NYCLU Legislative Director Robert Perry. "The familial search policy raises provocative questions: Will innocent family members become criminal suspects because a relative's DNA is a near match with crime scene evidence? Will the police ask, or compel, those family members to submit a DNA sample? And on the basis of an individual's 'partial' DNA match, will other, innocent family members be included in a local suspect watch list or have their own DNA stored in a local police databank?"
The commission members also split, 7-4, on the question of whether the proposed partial-match DNA policy required authorization by the state legislature. The NYCLU contends there are fundamental questions as to whether the policy adopted by the Commission today is authorized under existing law.
Full post as published by ACLU Newsroom on December 11, 2009 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Mattel and Fisher-Price Toy Recall
Magnets and Lead Paint manufactured in China Create Poisoning and Health Hazard
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
Missing Children
Databases and organizations
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Owasso, OK
$300,000 settlement reached in civil rights violations lawsuit.
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
alleging government agencies and officials violated immigrant workers' constitutional rights.
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.

NYCLU Launches Public Education Campaign on the Voting Rights of People with Criminal Records
UN rights chief calls for investigation of Sri Lanka rights abuses
Rights group urges Mexico to hold soldiers accountable for human rights abuses
UN council deplores Myanmar rights abuses
New Director at NACDL White Collar Crime Policy Office
Sri Lanka government ends inquiry into human rights abuses








