Throwing the book, methodically, at a victim's betrayers
By Mark Obbie
ADVERTISEMENTS
Here's what dogged reporting and cautious, transparent storytelling can
do to shine the light of accountability on public officials -- without
giving in to the natural urge to point immediate blame until the facts
are in. Last month, a judge in Los Angeles released a man with a
criminal history of abusing his wife. Despite repeated violent
incidents and a plea from the county probation office to hold the man
in jail, the judge allowed the husband out on bail before he was to
start a 16-month sentence for his latest attack on his wife. Over the
weekend, the husband killed his wife and then himself. Too often, such
a series of events would yield screaming headlines about the judge, the
most obvious target. But a trio of LA Times
reporters -- Andrew Blankstein, Mitchell Landsberg and Paloma Esquivel
(a former student of mine at Newhouse, I'm proud to say) -- reported on Tuesday
on the many possible mistakes that led to the crime, using numerous
records and human sources from a variety of agencies. They looked not
only at what the judge did, but at the DA's failure to object to bail.
And, importantly, they disclosed to readers in that first-day story
what they didn't yet know, writing:
It was unclear Monday if Fisher [the
judge] reviewed the Probation Department report or whether she was
fully aware of Harris' criminal record. It was also unclear how common
it is for defendants in such cases to be released before their prison
terms begin.
In a followup Wednesday,
Blankenstein reported the DA's office's preliminary investigation into
a series of lapses, including failing to warn the woman that he husband
was on the loose. There's more to come -- about authorities' failure to
protect the woman when she sought help shortly before her murder, and
about the original bail recommendation -- but the Times' dedication to
pinning down the facts and not letting the story race ahead of those
known facts serves as a model of dispassionate, fact-based reporting on
a highly emotional crime. (Via Gavel Grab, the blog of judicial-independence advocates Justice at Stake.)