ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: JURIST - The Paper Chase

UK to prosecute four officers in alleged assault of terror suspect

By Sarah Miley

ADVERTISEMENTS
Photo source or description
[JURIST] The UK Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced on Thursday that it will charge four former officers [press release] of the UK Metropolitan Police in the alleged assault of terrorism suspect Babar Ahmad [advocacy website; BBC profile]. Police Constables Nigel Cowley, John Donohue, Roderick James-Bowen and Mark Jones are accused of beating Ahmad during a 2003 arrest on suspicion of terrorism charges. Ahmad's supporters claim he suffered 73 injuries [AP report] between his arrest at his home and his arrival at a police station in central London. The officers will be charged in violation of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 [text]. The CPS originally chose not to prosecute the officers in 2004 after it found that there was insufficient evidence to bring charges against the officers, but decided to reconsider the evidence after the UK High Court ruled in favor of Ahmad in a civil action regarding the assault. The four officers are scheduled to appear before the City of Westminster Magistrates' Court on September 22.

Ahmad, a British citizen, has been incarcerated in the UK since his arrest and is currently awaiting a decision on whether he will be extradited to the US where he faces charges [JURIST report] of terrorism, conspiring to kill Americans and running a website used to fund terrorists and recruit al Qaeda members. In July the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) [official website] stayed the extradition [JURIST report] of Ahmad, holding that potential punishment could violate Human Rights Convention [text] provisions on the prohibition of torture and inhumane or degrading treatment. The court issued the injunction in order to further examine evidence against Ahmad and determine if the US sentencing standards, which includes life sentencing without parole, would lead to an Article 3 violation. The UK High Court approved the extradition [JURIST report] of Ahmad to the US in 2006 after the US offered assurances that it would not seek the death penalty, try the suspects before military tribunals or declare them enemy combatants.

Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on August 13, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0029 secs (from cache 11/06/26 11:25:17)