Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> FSU College of Law Library Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: FSU College of Law Library BlogCourt clarifies DNA review
By jlutz99
From the SCOTUSBlog:
The Supreme Court, ruling Monday on a granted case that never came up for oral argument, decided summarily that flaws in presenting DNA evidence during a criminal trial do not necessarily undermine the value of a conviction based in part on that evidence. After having the Nevada rape case of Troy Brown under review for nearly a full year, the Court decided it in an unsigned opinion and rejected two constitutional challenges to the conviction. It sent back to lower courts a third challenge. The decision was based mainly on a legal ground that neither side in the case believed remained in issue ? the sufficiency of the DNA evidence, under Jackson v. Virginia (1979).
Read the blog here.
Posted by Jon Lutz
Full post as published by FSU College of Law Library Blog on January 12, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Xigris
Study Prompts FDA Safety Review

BLAWGS: "Supreme Court Clarifies Purchaser and Other Issues in Consumer Protection Act."
NLJ: IRS Clarifies Rule on Taxing Forgiven Law Student Loans
Ohio Supreme Court clarifies requirements for trial court "final orders"
Zotero Review; Overwriting a Hard Drive; BlackBerry Storm; OmniPage Versions; STRIP Review
Tax Bureau Clarifies Investment Terms for Western Region









