Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> CalBizLit
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: CalBizLitWill California Finally Have An E-Discovery Law?
By Bruce Nye
In a post almost two years ago --during the very first month of CalBizLit -- I posted here on the absence of any real e-discovery law in California. So far, that hasn't changed.
Earlier this year, both houses of the legislature approved AB 926, which would have added provisions to California's Code of Civil Procedure addressing this issue. Unfortunately, Governor Ahnald, in a somewhat justifiable snit over the failure of the legislature to enact a budget, went on a bill-vetoing rampage, and this one, along with hundreds of others, went out to the Capitol dumpster.
Now Legal Pad reports that Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, D ? Santa Rosa is introducing just about the same bill, now AB 5. If approved and signed by the Guv, AB 5 would amend our procedures relating to "Inspection Demands" as follows:
- A party could demand to inspect, copy, test or sample electronically stored information;
- The demanding party could specify the form or forms in which electronically stored information was to be produced;
- The recipient of such a demand could object that the stored information is "not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or expense," or could move for a protective order on the same ground;
- The objecting or moving party has the burden of showing the information is "not reasonably accessible," and even if he, she or it does so, the court can still order its production "for good cause," but can set conditions and can allocate the cost; and
- If an inspection demand does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, the responding party can produce it either in "the form in which it is ordinarily maintained" or "in a form that is reasonably usable."
California needs to deal with this, and AB 5 doesn't seem unreasonable. The problem is this: California has a $28 billion budget shortfall over the next two years. The Governator has called an emergency session of the legislature to deal with it. Said legislature seems likely to do zilch. I detect more rampages of vetoes coming.
Full post as published by CalBizLit on December 04, 2008 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State
California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Seattle Mortgage Co Faces California Class Action
Seattle Mortgage Co Faces California Class Action
California Firm Recalls Ready-To-Eat Pork Products
California Firm Recalls Ready-To-Eat Pork Products
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
Disabled Win California Class Action
California Hospitals
Fined for Shoddy Care

E-Discovery Rules Proposed in California
Amendments Likely to California Law Regarding E-Discovery
A Judge Is (Finally) Forced to Step Down
Qualcomm Repute Had Been Violated By Legal Losses
Blawg of the Day -- e-discovery 2.0
Practitioner's Notes: California to Integrate Prisons (At Last)









