Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: The GavelJudge: FL Candidate Can Get ?Matching? Funds
By Peter Hardin
A federal judge in Florida refused to block distribution of millions of public “matching” dollars to Attorney General Bill McCollum’s cash-strapped gubernatorial campaign, after McCollum’s multimillionaire opponent had sought intervention.
McCollum and Rick Scott are seeking the Republican nomination. Scott contended that Florida’s public financing law for campaigns violates his First Amendment rights because it requires him to curb his campaign spending or face a “trigger” that provides dollars to his publicly funded rival, according to a Miami Herald article.
District Judge Robert Hinkle “concluded that there is a greater public interest in preventing corruption by preserving the state’s public-finance system than in protecting Scott’s First Amendment rights,” the newspaper reported.
A similar provision in Connecticut’s public financing law was struck down by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals this week (see Gavel Grab), and Judge Hinkle said he couldn’t predict the ultimate outcome of challenges to Florida’s law. A challenge to Florida’s law or another state’s law could end up with a 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court, he said.
?I?m not at all sure the (Florida) statute will be upheld, especially with given the way the wind is blowing on campaign finance?I can?t end the uncertainty,? an Orlando Sentinel article quoted Judge Hinkle as saying.
A similar provision in Arizona law was upheld, however, by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (see Gavel Grab). Judge Hinkle drew a distinction between the Florida statute and those in Arizona and Connecticut. He said Florida’s version for furnishing “matching” dollars to a participating candidate whose opponent exceeds a spending limit was passed in conjunction with a $500 limit on corporate and individual campaign contributions.
Florida’s public financing law “serves a compelling anti-corruption function,” the judge said.
Full post as published by The Gavel on July 15, 2010 (boomark / email).
HIV Funds
Dallas Independent School District pays $336,000 settlement for misappropriated program funds.
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Canceled Insurance
Judge orders Health Net Inc. to pay $9 million settlement after terminating a policyholder's policy after being diagnosed with breast cancer.
Labor and Delivery
Judge awards mother $6 million medical malpractice settlement after baby was born with brain injuries.
Oppenheimer Funds, Inc
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud

Supreme Court blocks Ariz. campaign finance law
"Matching funds OK for now, judge rules"
... But Fourth Circuit Upholds NC's Judicial Campaign Reform Act
9th Circuit panel upholds Ariz. matching funds
Ninth Circuit, on 3-0 Vote, Upholds Matching Funds Requirement in Arizona Public Financing Scheme









