Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"Justices Debate Issues in an Oceanfront Case"

"Justices Debate Issues in an Oceanfront Case": Adam Liptak has this article today in The New York Times. The newspaper also contains an editorial entitled "Common Sense and Private Property."

In today's edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that "Supreme Court rules Fla. beach work doesn't affect property owners' rights."

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that "Supreme Court rejects Florida beach owners' claim; Justices rule that Florida law trumps property rights in a case in which the state added sand to an eroding beach, turning oceanfront property into ocean-view property."

Joan Biskupic of USA Today reports that "Justices rule against Florida landowners in beach dispute."

Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers reports that "Florida beachfront landowners lose in Supreme Court tie."

Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor reports that "Supreme Court rules against homeowners in Florida beach dispute; The Supreme Court ruled against a group of waterfront property owners who said the state of Florida owed them money because it pumped sand onto beaches eroded by storms, lowering property values."

The St, Petersburg Times reports that "Supreme Court decision backs beach renourishment."

The Palm Beach Post reports that "Beachfront owners lose Supreme Court case over property rights."

And The Northwest Florida Daily News has an article headlined "Supreme Court: Restoring beaches is not 'taking' private property."

Full post as published by How Appealing on June 18, 2010 (boomark / email).