ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The Gavel

Another Push in Senate for Disclosure Vote?

By Peter Hardin

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Senate may try again in the next few weeks for a vote on House-passed legislation to require groups than run political ads to disclose their donors.

Senate Republicans blocked the bill’s advance in July (see Gavel Grab). Since then, published reports have spotlighted a dramatic decline in disclosure by independent groups receiving money for electioneering.

Today, an Associated Press article said two groups affiliated with the Republican Party have raised a total of $32 million this year, “using new freedom from fundraising restrictions to create a parallel and unofficial Republican campaign to defeat Democrats in November.” One of them, American Crossroads, has registered with the Federal Election Commission and is required to disclose its donors, but the second, Crossroads GPS, has simply registered as a nonprofit and is not required to make such disclosure.

A New York Times editorial, entitled “The Secret Election,” raised concern over political activity by “advocacy committees that are sucking in many millions of anonymous corporate dollars, making this the most secretive election cycle since the Watergate years.”

The editorial called on Congress to pass legislation that will shine a light on election spending, and it noted that “corporations got the power to pour anonymous money into elections from Supreme Court and Federal Election Commission decisions in the last two years, culminating in the Citizens United opinion earlier this year.”

President Obama, meanwhile, criticized Senate Republicans for blocking the disclosure legislation. On Saturday, he said the  Citizens United ruling fostered a “flood of deceptive attack ads sponsored by special interests using front groups with misleading names. We don’t know who’s behind these ads or who’s paying for them.”

Republicans, on the other hand, have accused Democrats of pressing the disclosure bill only to hold on to their majorities in the Congress, the Washington Post reported.

Full post as published by The Gavel on September 20, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0034 secs (from cache 11/04/26 03:23:38)