Litigation

Is there anyone who gets more wound up about my blogging than Rhonda Bentzen? 

Bentzen, a former structured settlement broker who went (by her own written admission) to the "dark side", is a structured settlement factoring broker, formerly the "go to girl" for factoring by the structured settlement industry. Instead of the aspirations to "ride the white horse, as it were", by avoiding questions it's more the case of riding Punxatawney Phil after he's seen his shadow.

If she'd simply answer the legitimate questions that were posed instead of launching personal attacks then the questions might stop.  The questions posed on Bentzen's blog and in this post on November 22, 2009 and still associated with herJuly 28,2009 post are:

Posted by: John Darer | November 22, 2009 at 11:42 AM

I have had multiple communications from a client of Structured Asset Funding and a copy of a Court document. As of two weeks ago they stated they WERE NOT paid and were about to lose a home. The BBB complaints also speak for themselves. If the annuitants have been paid since the story broke, then GOOD. That's what we are trying to achieve, results. If not we plan on going on the air with their story.

If fewer people are taking financial consideration from Bentzen in order to access then GOOD, why doesn't she simply tell us the percentage, and the reason for the drop? Wasn't it Rhonda Bentzen who made the assertion that payment of financial consideration to structured settlement brokers was good for annuitants ( a concept refuted by her competition)? Did the structured settlement transparency initiative have anything to do with the lower percentage? 

Instead of writing something intelligent about servicing or other issues as her competitors have done, why does she simply takes a swing at the person asking the questions?

This author is always open to reconsider a post if evidence is presented that it is incorrect.