ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> New Law Blogs Blogs -> Main Justice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

New Law Blogs

: Main Justice

Supreme Court Wary of Settlement for Brady Violations

By Andrew Ramonas

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared to doubt the reason for a $14 million judgment awarded to a death row inmate who claimed that New Orleans prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence in his murder case, The Associated Press reported.

Lawyers for John Thompson, who was convicted of a murder he did not commit, successfully argued in a U.S. district court that the state prosecutors assigned to his case were not adequately trained of their obligations under Brady v. Maryland, the 1963 Supreme Court case that requires prosecutors to turn over exculpatory information to the defense.

Justices questioned the amount of training that would be adequate under Brady. The court has not required prosecutors to undertake a certain amount of Brady instruction.

“I mean, is an hour a year enough? Is an hour a month enough?” Justice Elena Kagan asked, according to the AP.

The justices also discussed what would be covered in Brady training.

Chief Justice John Roberts said prosecutors need to know what they can and cannot say in closing arguments. Justice Anthony Kennedy said prosecutors should also learn about Miranda and search warrants.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said there is the potential for a lengthy training program if Brady instruction is mandated.

The concern is “that you don’t want to have to give the prosecutors a clinical law school course before you let them do their job,” Ginsburg said.

The Justice Department has already taken steps to beef up its prosecutors’ knowledge of Brady after government errors in the prosecution against the late Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska). The case was thrown out last year after it was discovered that prosecutors improperly withheld evidence from Stevens’ defense lawyers.

The DOJ now requires Brady training for its prosecutors and has an official who oversees efforts to ensure compliance with the 1963 Supreme Court ruling.

Full post as published by Main Justice on October 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/05/26 20:33:04)