Home -> Law Blog Directory -> New Law Blogs Blogs -> Main Justice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
New Law Blogs
: Main JusticeSupreme Court Wary of Settlement for Brady Violations
By Andrew Ramonas
The Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared to doubt the reason for a $14 million judgment awarded to a death row inmate who claimed that New Orleans prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence in his murder case, The Associated Press reported.
Lawyers for John Thompson, who was convicted of a murder he did not commit, successfully argued in a U.S. district court that the state prosecutors assigned to his case were not adequately trained of their obligations under Brady v. Maryland, the 1963 Supreme Court case that requires prosecutors to turn over exculpatory information to the defense.
Justices questioned the amount of training that would be adequate under Brady. The court has not required prosecutors to undertake a certain amount of Brady instruction.
“I mean, is an hour a year enough? Is an hour a month enough?” Justice Elena Kagan asked, according to the AP.
The justices also discussed what would be covered in Brady training.
Chief Justice John Roberts said prosecutors need to know what they can and cannot say in closing arguments. Justice Anthony Kennedy said prosecutors should also learn about Miranda and search warrants.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said there is the potential for a lengthy training program if Brady instruction is mandated.
The concern is “that you don’t want to have to give the prosecutors a clinical law school course before you let them do their job,” Ginsburg said.
The Justice Department has already taken steps to beef up its prosecutors’ knowledge of Brady after government errors in the prosecution against the late Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska). The case was thrown out last year after it was discovered that prosecutors improperly withheld evidence from Stevens’ defense lawyers.
The DOJ now requires Brady training for its prosecutors and has an official who oversees efforts to ensure compliance with the 1963 Supreme Court ruling.
Full post as published by Main Justice on October 06, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
EPA Violations
Riverside Cement to pay $384,000 for air quality violations.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Safety Violations
Murphy Oil USA Inc. to pay $179,100 settlement in occupational safety violations lawsuit.
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.

Brady and Prosecutorial Compliance
Brady Violations Compel New Trial in Capital Murder Case
Cert Grant Involving Brady Violations
Ind. Decisions - Brady Center announces Supreme Court gun ruling








