Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsAMP v. USPTO: What Everyone Else Is Saying
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, the District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in Association of Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, finding the claims of several patents directed to the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes invalid as encompassing non-statutory subject matter (see "Round One Goes to the ACLU"). On Thursday, we discussed the parties' reaction to the decision (see "AMP v. USPTO: What the Parties Are Saying About the Decision"). Today, we take a look at what others have been saying or reporting about the decision. ? In "US...Full post as published by Patent Docs on April 07, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

USPTO Warns Customers Regarding Unsolicited Third-Party Communications
USPTO Extends Comment Period For Deferred Examination
USPTO Rescinds Controversial Patent Regulations Package Proposed by Previous Administration
Controversial USPTO Rules Rescinded









