Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousObligation to point out the inventor and invention dates of each claim not commonly owned
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
In a recent first office action rejection, the examiner wrote the following:
"This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims under 35 U.S.C. 103(a), the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned at the time any inventions covered therein were made absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 C.F.R. 1.56 to point out the inventor and invention dates of each claim that was not commonly owned at the time a later invention was made in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 103(c) and potential 35 U.S.C. 102(e), (f) or (g) prior art under 35 U.S.C. 103(a). |
I'm confused by this examiner statement. (Otherwise, this particular office action is exceptionally well written). What I don't understand is the "obligation." After receiving this (or even before) are the patent applicants under a duty to describe the ownership structure and invention dates?
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on November 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Ladder Accident Injury Claims
Were you or a loved one injured in a ladder accident?
CVS
Consumer Products Sold Past Their Expirey Dates
Point Blank Solutions
Multi Million Dollar Settlement
Davison and Associates
Invention Promoters to Pay $10 Million in FTC Settlement
AIG Settles Injury Claim
for $18 Million
Failure-to-accommodate claim yields $1.82M award
$1.82 Million Awarded in Employment Lawsuit
Recovery Claim
Florida Insurance Guarantee Association agrees to pay $14 million settlement to Home Solutions of America for construction services.

Monday Book Review: Lincoln the Inventor
Effectively claiming an invention
Inventor testimony regarding intent during patent prosecution irrelevant to claim construction
A Few Points on the German Inventor Remuneration Process
Blawg Review #179 is the greatest thing since Blawg Review #178
Round 2 - Part 3 Review of the New Continuation Rules








