Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsPhRMA Representative Questions Follow-on Biologics Paper
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Donald Zuhn -- In a letter to the editor published in this week's edition of The New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. David Wheadon, Senior Vice President of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) Scientific & Regulatory Affairs team, attempts to set the record straight regarding a follow-on biologics (FOB) paper published in that medical journal last fall. The focus of Dr. Wheadon's criticism is a NEJM paper written by a New York patent attorney (Alfred Engelberg) and two Harvard professors (Dr. Aaron Kesselheim and Dr. Jerry Avorn), in which the three authors contend that the FOB...Full post as published by Patent Docs on February 19, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Income Tax Changes for 2007
Get Answers to your Income Tax Questions
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Follow-On Biologics Bill Set To Try Again
US Biologics Debate Heats Up As Congress, Obama, Wrangle With Healthcare Reform
Economist Argues That 7 Years Ought to be Enough for Biologic Data Exclusivity
Questions on Paper Assignments
DOJ Hits Pfizer with $2.3B Bill









