Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsIn re Arora (Fed. Cir. 2010)
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Donald Zuhn -- Earlier this month, the Federal Circuit, in In re Arora, affirmed a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences affirming the rejection of claims 11-16 of Appellant Arun Arora's application as being obvious in view of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,978,286 and 5,934,273. Claims 11-16 of Dr. Arora's application relate to a method for converting drug dosages to prevent overdose. Representative claim 11 recites: 11. A method for converting drug dosages to prevent overdose, comprising the steps of: defining a common medication reference range; assigning dosages of first and second drugs to respective values within...Full post as published by Patent Docs on March 29, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

American Board of Internal Medicine sues Arora Board Review in trade secrets case
IOSCO Report on Hedge Fund Oversight
Might the consumer banking revolution be coming







