Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Charlottesville Personal Injury LawyerFDA Rules Regarding Internet Drug Ads Create Confusion
By Greg Webb
Late last month, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent strong warning letters to fourteen major pharmaceutical companies that the companies' search advertisements, or the short text ads that run beside Google results, have to include risk information about each drug or else be removed. The letter cited examples of Celebrex, Propecia and Yaz, which did not include the precautions that the agency required. The drug manufacturer Merck, for example, was reprimanded by the FDA for making its drug Singulair appear safer than has been demonstrated. Many feel this is sign of increased vigilance in the new FDA administration.
Until the letters were issued, drug companies assumed there was a one-click rule, which required them to publish risk information within one click of their ads, or on the page that the ad linked to. The companies argued that the FDA is ignoring the realities of internet marketing; there is no way they can include all of the required information in the ads because Google only allows ninety-five characters for search ads. While companies are changing their ads to comply with the warning, executives say the solution is worse than the problem; advertisements are now even more misleading. Representatives for the FDA, however, say if there is not adequate risk information, or you overstate the benefit of a drug, that is false advertising; risk information is required on every advertisement no matter the medium.
Drug companies changed almost all of their ads after receiving the letters because they do not want to be on the wrong side of the FDA, however, the sense in the industry was that the letters were just telling what they should and shouldn't do as opposed to giving strict mandates. Online advertisements are now using generic-sounding brand names to redirect to a brand's website. Propecia, for example, now redirects links through a website called 'hair-loss-medication.com' instead of propecia.com.
These solutions have problems, however, in that consumers may think these sites are neutral when they are really redirected to a sales site. In fact, Google will only allow pharmaceutical companies to redirect this way. Consumers will also rarely see the official websites in the sponsored search results and will instead see links to Canadian pharmacies and other unregulated herbal offerings.
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg WebbFull post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on April 26, 2009 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Mitchell Report Summary
Report on Steroid Drug Use in Major League Baseball by Senator George Mitchell
Gambling Governed by State Laws
State laws vary with respect to gambling
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Drug Manufacturer Rebates
Caremark Corp. agrees to pay $38.5 million settlement after convincing doctors to switch drug brands.
Bell Canada
allegedly throttling internet speeds
Adzilla
Faces Class Action for Internet Spying
FDA Issues Warning Regarding Topical Ibuprofen Drug Products
Topical Ibuprofen Drug Products FDA Issues Warning Letters

YOU CREATE. WE PROTECT. confusion with CREATE PROTECT
Arizona Keyword and Metatag Case
Brandowners Warn Against Cybersquatting, User Confusion From New Internet Domains
Ind. Courts - "Judge proposes rules aimed at DTF 'ethical concerns'"
New Phenomenon: "Google Mistrials"
Supreme Court Rules 6-3 That State-Law Drug Injury Claims Are Not Preempted By FDA Drug Approval









