Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Politics Blogs -> Portfolio.com: Capital

Politics

: Portfolio.com: Capital

Don't Decide Before Denver

By Matt Cooper

I have a crazy idea. What if Democrats actually use their convention as a convention instead of an infomercial?

Right now, Democrats are fretting over the Clinton-Obama race as if it were the death knell of their party and coming up with one crazy scheme after another to shut down the race. First, we had supporters of Barack Obama like Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont call on his opponent to drop out. Never mind that no one this close in a race for the presidency had ever dropped out before and leaving aside the arrogance that dictates someone should quit so you don't have to win. Even Obama himself said Hillary Clinton had every prerogative to stay in the race until the balloting was done.

Now you've got a few schools of thought. One is that superdelegates must rush to make a decision as soon as the last balloting finishes on June 3 in Montana and South Dakota. Tennessee Governor Phil Breseden has even proposed a convention of superdelegates so that they can all decide and tip the nomination two months before the Democrats are scheduled to meet in Denver from August 25-28. Howard Dean has indicated that he'd like the superdelegates to decide quickly. That's very sporting coming from a chairman who has so screwed up the party's nominating system that two of the largest and most pivotal states in the general election, Michigan and Florida, won't have their delegates won't be seated.

The feeling that's driving this get-it-done-now sentiment is that John McCain and the Republicans only gain from Democratic disunity. I agree that the ideal situation for the Democrats would be to unanimously rally around one nominee and train their fire on the presumptive Republican nominee. But that's not possible when you have a divided party. And the best place to unite a divided party is at a convention.

We've come to see conventions as four-day infomercials for the political parties but, of course, it wasn't always so. Until relatively recently actual work got done at these conventions and there was no prevailing ethos that the party would immolate itself if it didn't cook the books to get a nominee in advance.

In 1952, Dwight Eisenhower had to wrestle the nomination at the Republican National Convention. He went on to win the general election in a landslide. As my mentor and one time boss, Charles Peters, the founder and editor of The Washington Monthly, noted in his book, Five Days in Philadelphia, about the 1940 nomination of Wendell Wilkie to be the Republican party nominee against Franklin Roosevelt, the convention helped save the world. By beating back the isolationist wing of the party, Wilkie gave Roosevelt the space to support Great Britain during its darkest hour. Without the convention, Peters argues, Roosevelt probably would not have been able to aid Britain and the island nation could well have fallen to Germany. Yes, Wilkie lost. But the convention was good for the country.

The stakes won't be as high in Denver where the ideological differences between Clinton and Obama are miniscule. In all likelihood, if the fight between the presidential rivals and Senate colleagues goes on all summer, McCain probably will benefit--for a time. But once the party votes in Denver, in a transparent massively televised event, then there will be plenty of time for healing before the fall. What won't help the Democratic Party is forcing Clinton out or pressuring superdelegates to vote before they're ready.

We're still learning a lot about these candidates, especially Obama who has not exactly been on the national scene for a long time. It may be that the months of June, July and August will help the superdelegates come to the same conclusion as the pledged delegates--that Obama is the right man to lead the party. But the summer might turn up more doubts about Obama (just as the spring has) and better to let them come out now than in the fall. Either way, the place to resolve all of this is in Denver, and not in some smoke-filled room, but in a televised convention for all to see.

Exhaustion is a real factor driving this. I'm as eager as anyone to get this campaign over with. I know my spouse, who as I always note, works for Clinton, is as tired as is everyone on the Obama campaign. No wonder top Obama aides were seen sporting T-shirts saying, "End the Drama. Vote Obama." Every Democrat wants a vacation. Tough.

If the ethos prevails that no real work can ever get done at a convention--that all must be decided and choreographed in advance--then we should really abolish conventions. They are fueled by taxpayer dollars that shouldn't go to a stage production. (We have Congress for that.) If no work can ever get done at a convention, then they are mere expense account junkets for reporters and a show for the two parties to put on. All of the work at the convention could get done with software. Why waste everyone's time?

That's not what I believe. I think conventions matter and are good for the republic. Too bad so many Democrats want to emasculate one of the great political traditions we still have.

PHOTO: A chair and ballon mark the podium position and point in space of the Democratic Presidential nominee. The 2008 Democratic National Convention will be held at the Pepsi Center in Denver. Credit: Chuck Kennedy/MCT/Landov

Related Links
Which Candidate Do Oil Companies Like Most?
The Long, Hard Slog
Mark Penn's Missed Microtrends

Full post as published by Portfolio.com: Capital on April 24, 2008 (boomark / email).