Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Public Defense Blogs -> Kansas Defenders
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Public Defense
: Kansas DefendersCouple of Gant GVRs (sort of)
Here is the order in State v. Jones, No. 99,216 (Kan. 2009) and State v. Craig, No. 99,527 (Kan. 2009).
BTW, for those who are really interested in the minutae of appellate procedure (that's you Paige), I thought this was an interesting disposition. Remanded to the district court. Rule 8.03(h)(2), cited in the Craig order provides authority to "remand the appeal to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of authority identified in the Supreme Court's order." It doesn't say anything about the district court. And, as a result, there really isn't an appellate disposition (i.e. affirmed, reversed, vacated, etc.). I wonder how the district court does anything in the case if the lower court judgment wasn't vacated. (I think that's how SCOTUS orders are usually worded right? Granted, vacated, and remanded?)
Full post as published by Kansas Defenders on September 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Couple Reaches Settlement
Survived Helicopter Crash but Permanently Injured
Couple Awarded Nearly One Million Dollars in Lawsuit
Condo Lawsuit Gets $1 Million Award

New law review article on Gant and Buie
SCOTUSwiki Preview: Arizona v. Gant
The Holding of Gant, and Some Initial Questions as To Its Application::








