Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Public Defense Blogs -> Kansas Defenders
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Public Defense
: Kansas DefendersRecent cert petition filed
We filed a similar petition last year in Green v. Kansas, blogged about here. The state's main response at that time was that there was no split of authority on the issue (because no other jurisdictions had reached the merits of such an issue). Our petition was denied last year after the SCOTUS ordered the state's response.
This last summer, the Arizona Supreme Court reached the issue and held that aggravating a sentence based on a non-statutory "catch all" aggravator was "patently" vague. See State v. Schmidt, 208 P.3d 214 (Ariz. June 3, 2009). So, now there's a clear split of authority.
If you have any cases where the prosecution is relying on non-statutory aggravating factors in an upward durational departure case, be sure to object!
Full post as published by Kansas Defenders on September 04, 2009 (boomark / email).
Amazon Kindle
Class Action Filed over Cracking Defect
Major Egg Producers
Class Action Filed over Alleged Price Fixing
National Class Action Filed Against Four Polycarbonate Plastic Baby Bottle Manufacturers
Regions Morgan Keegan
Class Action Suits Filed Concerning Mutual Funds
Comcast
National Class Action Filed

Cert. Petition Filed in Duke v. Leake Case
Petition for Cert. Filed with Supreme Court in another Walmart Reimbursement Case
Recent Cert. Petition on Aggravated Identity Theft
Germain Critiques Government's Response to Murphy's Cert. Petition







