ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Thoughts in a Haystack

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Religion & Law

: Thoughts in a Haystack

The Big Tent Gets All Sticky ...

By John Pieret

ADVERTISEMENTS

As PZ Mxyzptlk points out, there was all too much mutual stimulation going on for comfort during the close encounter of Ken Ham and Ben Stein. Ham describing Stein as "brilliant" was bad enough but to then go on to laud him as an "actor/ economist/ lawyer/ presidential speechwriter/ science observer -- a 21st-century Einsteinian figure" would make Johnny Wad want to go and take a shower.

But this is the part that I find particularly interesting. Stein was in Nashville for a special preview showing of Expelled: The Legend to yet another religious audience at the annual convention of the National Religious Broadcasters. According to Ham:

The audience leapt to its feet with generous applause at the film's conclusion?moved by the undaunted attempts of the Darwin-doubters (and their filmmaking allies) as they challenge the elites in America's educational and scientific establishments. Many of these Darwin challengers find themselves pitted against powerful evolutionists who despotically protect their evolution belief system, and sometimes expel those who would dare question Darwin.
One wonders what mental gymnastics Ham goes through to consider it a complement to describe someone as "Einsteinian" and yet find those who are part of the "scientific establishment" to be "elites."

As far as Stein's role in this, perhaps his motives are similar to another conservative, Irving Kristol, who believes religion to be essential for instilling and maintaining morality in society:

There are different kinds of truths for different kinds of people. There are truths appropriate for children; truths that are appropriate for students; truths that are appropriate for educated adults; and truths that are appropriate for highly educated adults, and the notion that there should be one set of truths available to everyone is a modern democratic fallacy. It doesn't work.
Ken Ham has had his doubts before about Intelligent Design, perhaps because he realized that the "elites" in that movement had about the same opinion of him and AiG as the "scientific establishment" does. Maybe the people who think of underpaid and overworked university professors, instructors and grad students as "elites" had better check out just who it is that is cozying up to them.
.

Full post as published by Thoughts in a Haystack on March 13, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/04/26 20:32:51)