Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Religion ClausePolygamy Charges Dismissed By British Columbia Supreme Court
By Howard M. Friedman
Full post as published by Religion Clause on September 24, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
False Arrest
City of Greer pays $50,000 settlement after imprisoning a woman whose charges had been dismissed years earlier.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Class action dismissed for allegedly failing to protect New Orleans from the levee breach.
AT&T International Roaming Charges, AT&T lawsuit
AT&T Faces International Roaming Charges Lawsuit
British Airways Lost-Luggage
Class-Action Gets Green Light
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation

Polygamy Reference: One to Watch
Canadian FLDS Leader Denied Advance of Legal Fees In B.C. Polygamy Reference
Canadian arrests trigger probable polygamy challenge
British Columbia: Polygamy charges against Bountiful leaders dropped
Canada: Blackmore seeks funds for polygamy hearing
Tercon Heads For Supreme Court Showdown
Lorraine E. Weinrib: Shooting down polygamy law not necessarily a slam dunk
The Breadth of Our Freedom of Expression
The Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements in R. v. Stirling







