Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectPro-lifers and ?repeal and replace?
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
James C. Capretta writing at Public Discourse: "Richard Stith, a pro-life law professor at Valparaiso University, is urging his fellow pro-lifers to stay off the 'repeal and replace' bandwagon. In an article for First Things online, he has suggested that a more promising approach for pro-lifers is amending the new law with clear pro-life language . . . No one suggests that all pro-lifers must adhere to this kind of thinking and support 'repeal and replace.' But, at the same time, it should not be expected that all pro-lifers will be satisfied with adding a Hyde-like amendment to what has already been passed."Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on November 19, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Repeal The Health Care Law Not So Fast
Repeal The Health Care Law Not So Easy
THE ELECTORATE IS receptive to repeal and replace. The public has not, contrary to the Lefts
JENNIFER RUBIN: Repeal And Replace But First Reveal.
Repeal the Repeal in New Mexico
Light at the End of the DADT Tunnel








