ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> State Courts Blogs -> Law Library Letter

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

State Courts

: Law Library Letter

Summary 2009 WY 4

ADVERTISEMENTS
Summary of Decision issued January 22, 2009

Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.

Case Name: Shores v. Bucklin

Citation: 2009 WY 4

Docket Number: S-08-0033

Appeal from the District Court of Big Horn County, the Honorable Steven R. Cranfill, Judge.

Representing Appellant Shores: J. Craig Abraham, Plains Law Offices, LLP, Gillette, Wyoming.

Representing Appellee Bucklin: Stephen L. Simonton, Stephen L. Simonton, PC, Cody, Wyoming.

Facts/Discussion: The Shores appealed from the district court?s order entering judgment in favor of the Bucklins quieting title to a parcel of land in Big Horn County. The court ruled that summary judgment was proper, in that the Shores did not have evidence to support a ?color of title? theory. Also, there was not satisfaction of the 10-year period for adverse possession. Pursuant to the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure (W.R.A.P.), dismissal was proper as a sanction for failure to comply with the scheduling order.

The Shores argued on appeal that there were genuine issues of material fact which a jury should be allowed to determine. The Court has previously held that the party seeking judicial review of an administrative action must comply with the W.R.A.P. and when they fail to do so, the Court may refuse to consider the contentions; assess costs; dismiss the appeal; or affirm the lower court?s decision. The Shores failed to comply with applicable rules, including failure to provide any citation to the record; they also failed to provide relevant argument or legal authority to support their contentions. The Court summarily affirmed the decision of the district court.

Conclusion: Summary judgment in favor of the Bucklins was affirmed. The Shores were ordered to reimburse costs and attorney?s fees generated in the defense of the instant appeal.

Affirmed.

J. Hill delivered the decision.

Link: http://tinyurl.com/d6zruq .

[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. Please note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you pinpoint cite to a quote, you should cite to this paragraph number rather than to any page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.]

Full post as published by Law Library Letter on January 22, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/02/26 02:57:32)