ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Trademark Law Blogs -> Las Vegas Trademark Attorney

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Trademark Law

: Las Vegas Trademark Attorney

Salt Lake City Sues TSA Over SIMPLIFLY

By Ryan Gile

ADVERTISEMENTS


On March 23, 2009, Salt Lake City Corporation (?SLC?), the municipal corporation which includes the Salt Lake City Department of Airports which operates and manages the Salt Lake City International Airport, filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (?DHS?) and its airport seucurity division, the Transportation Security Administration (?TSA?), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. See Salt Lake City Corporation v. Department of Homeland Security et al, Case No. 09-cv-00257 (D. Utah.). A copy of the complaint can be viewed here. Newspaper reports on the lawsuit can be found here and here.

SLC holds a federal trademark registration for the mark SIMPLI-FLY which it claims to have used since July 2003 in connection with its airport customer assistance and information services (e.g., providing information to callers regarding airport security, airline procedures, and other airport services and facilities). The mark was registered February 21, 2005. I was unable to find any current picture of SLC's use of its mark, but pictured below is the specimen provided by SLC when it filed its application.



At issue in SLC?s complaint is TSA?s use of the term SIMPLIFLY on its website in connection with providing information and recommendations regarding airport security procedures. A copy of TSA?s ?SIMPLIFLY? poster is shown below.


SLC believes that TSA?s continued use of the mark in connection with airport security information services is likely to cause confusion with its registered service mark. SLC sent a cease and desist letter to TSA on January 11, 2008, and then a follow-up cease and desist letter on December 31, 2008 ? neither TSA or DHS replied to SLC?s letter as and evidenced by the above link, TSA is still using SIMPLIFLY.

SLC?s causes of action are for registered trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. §1114, false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. §1125(a), common law trademark infringement and unfair competition, trademark dilution under 15 U.S.C. §1125(c) [ed.-seriously?famous?], and deceptive trade practices under Utah law (Utah Code Ann. §13-11a-3).

Full post as published by Las Vegas Trademark Attorney on March 25, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 11/03/26 03:04:52)